Later edit: added just to clarify that this post follows an "in real life" event that I didn't give the background on because I don't have the strength to talk about it directly. At some point I'll probably hash it out in greater detail.
I have an unwanted identity: an undisciplined, cowardly, selfish, irresponsible, narcissistic, lazy, awkward, and arrogant fool. This was instilled in me while I was very young. My inner critic carries the twisted messages of my childhood forward: manage your life perfectly in all areas through force of will and discipline no matter how miserable or marginalized it makes you feel. If you fail at that, apologize for yourself, but don’t expect the apology to fix anything—you’ll just have to make up for your mistakes by never failing again.
I have an unwanted identity: an undisciplined, cowardly, selfish, irresponsible, narcissistic, lazy, awkward, and arrogant fool. This was instilled in me while I was very young. My inner critic carries the twisted messages of my childhood forward: manage your life perfectly in all areas through force of will and discipline no matter how miserable or marginalized it makes you feel. If you fail at that, apologize for yourself, but don’t expect the apology to fix anything—you’ll just have to make up for your mistakes by never failing again.
It is an impossible standard that haunts me and follows me
into everything I do. I have a lot of faults, a lot of “bad” things woven into
my being. But even as I accept that, I find myself rejecting the notion that I
should strive toward some impossible standard in the hopes of “improving” myself
and “moving past” those negative facets of myself.
When does it end?
When am I enough? When are any of us enough? How long and
through how many lives will we devote ourselves to the task of purging our
being of those disagreeable things we hesitate to talk about? What do we hope
to accomplish in that pursuit? We acknowledge that perfection is unattainable
but hold that we should keep working toward that perfection because…why?
Because the “improvements” one makes along the way are valuable? Are they? Or
is it just a grand shell game, trading in one flaw for another? How much of
ourselves should we be willing to change for the sake of an ideal? When do we
stop being ourselves if we do that? Where is the line between self improvement and
the destruction of self?
The most powerful thing He ever said to me was “She is not
better than you.” I think that’s the only time Set ever shouted at me. The
world came crashing down in that moment. The ideal suddenly vanished from
reality as I looked around and realized there were no real examples of it. It
was suddenly entirely fantasy, abstract and unproven, a thing to be taken on
faith alone. And my brother’s voice floated into my mind and I was back in a
conversation we had shared once on a long drive.
“Do you know what utopia translates to?” he asked, “It means
‘nowhere’, like it literally says the word means that it describes something which
doesn’t exist.”
“Did you make that up?”
“No,” he laughed, “it’s true—or it’s a real footnote in this
book anyway.”
It was a philosophy book. I later checked the fact and it is
true.
It means more to me now than it did then. Utopia is nowhere
and perfection is nothing. I know that intuitively and I know it on a lot of
different levels. I could be the best person I know how to be and still hurt
people sometimes because I will never be perfect at it. I will never even be
near perfect. So why do I strive? If I am not actively destroying the world
around me, if I am mostly harmless, why is there such burden to think of myself
as “not enough”? Not pious enough, not kind enough, not selfless enough, not
honest enough, not industrious enough….on and on. I could fix things until the
end of time and never have everything fixed. So what gets priority? Do I decide
that or does society decide it? Am I chasing a “higher” version of myself or
just the approval of others (who probably have their own agendas to back the
priorities they set)? Is there an objectively “right” way to be or is that a matter
of societal taste as it evolves through the centuries? Is my generation, the “me
generation”, really so bad or are we just nailed (like every generation before
us) for being different and changing the status quo?
And even if I’m way off base on that: when do I stop trying
to “better” myself and redirect my energy to doing something meaningful as the
person I already am? No amount of fixing will make the tasks I aspire to any
easier to accomplish. If I hold my tongue every time I fear I might be saying
something disagreeable or “wrong” I will never speak. (Or, at least, I will
never speak honestly.) If who I am now isn’t good enough, then I’ll never be
good enough and to hell with it all anyway.
But it’s easy to say that. It’s harder to commit to it. Because
I don’t want to be a “bad person”. Because I don’t want to hurt people. Because
most of the time I don’t mind trying and I don’t mind changing if it makes
things easier for myself and for others. Because that little voice inside me keeps going
back to the beginning and reminding me… undisciplined, cowardly, selfish,
irresponsible, narcissistic, lazy, awkward, and arrogant fool. Because
there is no shortage of voices out there ready to reaffirm that voice if I don’t
conform and submit to the cult of never-good-enough.
And on one level, I know I’m loved in spite of it all. But I
don’t always feel like I am. I pull away and slip away and contemplate moving
somewhere where no one knows me and trying again to live perfectly. There’s
this insidious little whisper inside me that tells me if I can just be perfect
then I’ll be loved and feel loved. It’s a damn lie, and I know it is—but
sometimes I give into it.
Being is hard.
No comments:
Post a Comment